#Armadillo software protection system cracked
#Armadillo software protection system software
#Armadillo software protection system license
#Armadillo software protection system crack

There is so much mess happening with вЂњsoftware protection, different operating system, user permissions, firewalls, antiviruses etc.вЂќ particularly on Windows.

#Armadillo software protection system software

those solutions embedding your software in a wrapper and unwrapping it etc.).

DonвЂ™t make your software protection overly complicated / complex (e.g.

#Armadillo software protection system cracked

We had legit business owners sending us support requests for cracked software.

#Armadillo software protection system crack

I do not agree with the notion вЂњyeah, people donвЂ™t crack your software anymoreвЂќ. Otherwise people will crack your software like hell. We use services such as Muso (medium happy) and (very happy) also sometimes вЂњtrack that crackвЂќ. EVERY software can be cracked - and you should go after the crackers.

#Armadillo software protection system license

LimeLM (and other similar solutions) can ONLY protect you from вЂњpeople using a VALID license on more machines than intended by youвЂќ.

LimeLM DLLs) and at least verify the libraries if you use dynamic linking. After a couple of years of experience dealing with customers cracks etc, here is maybe some bottom line: Since we pay him (and not the other way around) I think we are off the hook with the recommendation. We are using LimeLM by Wyatt as well and we are quite happy (or very happy). The only serious problem are stolen keys that work with executables that can be downloaded from your website. And i still want people to use pirated versions of my software more then if they use the software of my competitor. And with the current virus and malware epidemia the people who pay for software (and they are the only ones you should care about, not some students without money) are not using cracks anymore. If you attract people who can crack your typical home made protection you have a good program already. I dumped Armadillo (because it was incredible slow on network computers doing a blocking broadcast message in the network segment - Facepalm) in 2007 after 1 year of usuage and saw no effect at all. IвЂ™m not a bliever in spending to much money on protection. Split the process into two tasks, the license stuff (usually an asynmmetric key with high encryption bitrate to prevent key generators) and the protection. One of the things that pissed a lot of customers of my last ISV company was the change in license system which required a change of their license keys. There are a lot of legitimate software licensing companies out there. IвЂ™ve written an article about snake oil in the software licensing industry here (it also, talks about LimeLM, but it was written in a way to make potential customers more knowledgeable about the software protection in general, whether they ultimately chose us or not): So a company that claim вЂњSoftware copy protection against reverse engineering with anti-cracking & anti-debugging techniques.вЂќ is selling snake oil. Sure, script-kiddies will moan about вЂњuncrackable softwareвЂќ on forums, but crackers with knowledge of debuggers itвЂ™s a walk in the park. And, frankly, software is not that hard to crack, no matter how many вЂњin-memory encyptionвЂќ and вЂњobfuscationвЂќ tricks are used. The long-and-short of it is this: every piece of software is crackable. Either case is worrisome (which is worse: incompetence or malice?)ДЄ simple google search and I was able to find a cracked version of PELock. They either (a) donвЂ™t actually understand how cracking is done or (b) theyвЂ™re deliberately misleading customers in order to get their business at any cost. My opinion of companies that claim they have uncrackable software or uncrackable protection is very, very low. Full disclosure: IвЂ™m founder and CEO of wyDay, a company that makes LimeLM вЂ“ a software licensing product for Windows, Mac, Linux, etc.